Which program should I choose?
Classic, Horizon, or Zenith, and who each one suits.
Updated September 10, 2026
The three programs give you the same account sizes, the same drawdown, the same 90% split, and the same payout system. What differs is how you get funded and which consistency rule applies afterwards.
| Classic | Horizon | Zenith | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evaluation | One step | One step | None |
| Consistency to pass | None | 40% | Not applicable |
| Consistency when funded | 35% | None | 20% |
Pick Classic if you want the cheapest route
One step, no consistency rule to pass, so you can reach the target however you like. A 35% consistency rule applies to payouts once you are funded, which means no single day can be more than 35% of the profit you are withdrawing against.
Pick Horizon if you want freedom once funded
The evaluation asks for balanced trading (no day above 40% of your profit), and in exchange there is no consistency rule at all on the funded account. Nothing limits how much of your profit comes from one good day.
This is the one to choose if you have passed evaluations before and the payout rules are what frustrate you.
Pick Zenith if you do not want to prove anything first
No evaluation and no profit target. You are funded from your first trade. You pay more up front because you are skipping the filter that the other two use.
Consistency is 20% on every payout.
A note on all three
None of them use a daily loss limit, and consistency is never a violation. If you exceed it, the payout waits until more trading days dilute it. Your account is not closed for it.
Classic is the cheapest, Horizon costs a little more, and Zenith costs more because it removes the evaluation entirely. Current prices.
Still deciding? Compare every specification side by side.