Prove it once. Then nothing gets in the way.

Horizon runs a single evaluation phase with a 50% consistency requirement: when you reach the target, no single day can account for more than half of your profit. That sets a floor of three trading days. Two cannot clear it except on an exact even split, since any imbalance pushes the bigger day past half. We do not add a separate day count on top, because the rule already does that work.

Once you are funded, the consistency rule is gone. Not reduced, not applied at a higher threshold, not reintroduced after a few payouts. There is no limit on how much of your withdrawal came from a single session.

That is the whole design, and it is a choice about where the rule sits, not whether there should be one. Classic keeps it at the payout stage, which is how most firms work, so it applies every time you withdraw. Horizon moves it to the front: prove balance once, then trade without it.

Most traders who complain about funded accounts are not complaining about the evaluation. They passed it. They are complaining about what happens afterwards, when a consistency rule holds up a payout because one session went unusually well.

The rule is doing real work wherever it sits. It asks for evidence across several days before we send money, which is exactly why Classic uses one at payout. The cost is that a trader who caught a big move has already done the job, and still waits while later days dilute it.

So Horizon asks the question once, at the point where it genuinely tells us something, and then stops asking. You pay a little more than Classic and trade a stricter evaluation. What you get is the fewest rules of anything we sell.